Rediffla intha news paatha udanay Bharathidasanoda Gummiyadi song thaan nyabagam varuthu. After years of hypocrisy Wimbeldon sheds its chauvinistic skin and has announces equal prize money for both men and women. Enna ketta womens tennisku neriya kaasu kudukanum for they are the original crowd pullers..sania mirzalenthu..sharapova varaikum yaar viladinalum gumbalo gumbal coming..mensla thala federer matrum oru sila makkaloda matches thaan real money spinners..michamellam sontha oor kaarangarathunala vara gumbal thaan..
ettu thisaiyil Aanukingay
pen illaipillai kaan
There goes my 2 cents for feminism :D
Makkalay...oru interesting discussion on this topic..feel free to comment on this also..
V: s sire
S: you sound like sexist and chauvinistic da
V: at ur service???enda?
S: new post padi partha :)
V: y?correcta thaanda potruken
S: nope da..
V: enna no?i stand by my point
S: see da.. women cant talk about equality.. and all that
V: ??now whos chauvinistic
S: see da.. it s all about survival of the fittest :D in work place..
women work the same as men workers..in IT or any major industry it s all about brains..but sports is different it is more of muscles..
V: hahaha dei dubaks
S: and men have more of it..
V: computer gamesla kooda enda
S: and they deserve more
V: expert medium easynu level vachurkaan
S: computer is fine with me..
V: tts not chavunisitcda
S: this sounds same like reservation argument..sounds.. silly..
V: ialda oru tourney tt too conducted at such a level cant be biased
S: that s the point
V: give me a reason for reduced money for them
S: when someone makes software..women makes it men make it both get same pay
cause.. the resultant product is of same quality in the case of tennis.. or athletics..men cross 100m in 9.77 seconds women cross 100m in 10.9 seconds
there goes the difference..based on output.... i rest my case
V: idhey men took several decades to break tt barrier women ipo than veetay thaandi vanthrukanga and rt away they are at 10 sec mark
S: no da.
V: i rest my case
S: you are missing the point
S: women will take eons to beat men that s cause.. of the body make up
men are agile..women are not..
V: waitbuddy ...my daughter will beat ur son in 100 m
S: there are some tasks.. which men can do better than women
V: viceversa holds gud too obviously
S: that's the not the point.. though.. making jokes belittles our argument :)
hang on..see da..take an athletic man..(best) and best women athlete..
there s no way.. they can compete at the same level..it s all common sense
i.e women cannot beat men in physical tasks..simply because they are not made that way and lets face it every action has equal and opposite reaction..you do something.. you get paid.. proportionally .....i rest my case
how do u measure propotion in a game
speed at which they serve?
S: lets take athletics..
where numbers are easily distinguishable..
maurice greene takes 9.77 s
V: one nimit
V: in tt case
asians take more time than europeans
who are slower than americans or africans
appo gold carat orutha orutharukum
S: no da..
i never told that..
what i am saying is .. let africans win..
cause.. they are good at it..
unna amthiri aaalunga dangerda i guess issac asimovs stories mite come true
S: what do you mean?
V: a better race where everyone is super fit with no place for weaklings
or rather not so fit people sounds familiar? read the doctrine of the nationalist socialist party aka nazism :D ??? sounday kanum
S: fantastic argument..but listen.. da..
if you want everyone to be the winners then create categories..break the society into n number of divisions
S: and give everyone their gold medals
V: nee solrathu utopiala vena possible real worldla no way
S: i dont know.. where our argument is going..
V: complexity makes the world goes round man ellamay same irukkarathungarathu scopeay ila
S: i am not saying.. women deserve to be slaughtered or put in gas chambers
S: i am saying.. pay them proportionally
i dint say tt u said it
wat i mean is mix n match cant be avoided nee solra mathiri if we slot winners and losers in boxes soon the latters will slot themselves as the next besters
and it will go in an AP with diminishing difference
in the end its all chaos jus to prove tt i am beter than u and to avoid the taunts
i wud fight with u and all goes down same with the winners slot the winningest
S: fighting is what makes you or me better we fall we learn
V: and the next winning teams will fight
S: if you appease.. then there is no progress
V: a war doesnt determine who is rt but who is left
S: there will one be whole lots of appeasers
V: engayo padicha quote six adichen par
S: only wars/conflicts can help you grow..
if you keep avoiding facing the truth.. then it s a prob i am not talking about bloody wars here.. it s arguments and competition
V: war is no way to learn truthu dei nee histroye padichathilaya
S: no da.. i am not talking about bloody wars it s about competition.. / conflicts
you fight with me.. now..if you did not refute my point..they you appease..
hoep you got it
V: me talking abt end u talking abt the means towards it erkanavay irukara division porathunu ithu vera
S: you cant reach the end without means..
V: meaningless ends hahah dei maniratnam padam mathiri
S: and lets face it.. everyone cannot be winners
V: pesa arambichitaom :D yes then
S: it s like a class room with 40 students only one chap gets the first rank
and so on...
V: yes but in a class room board same desk same teacher same teaching same
and first mark is same athuku kidakara prizeum same ellamay equal not more for boys
not less for gals
V: tts all ur honour maanangetavanay :D
S: so in classroom men and women compete together
and there s no quota for girls first rank
you think the same thing happens in tennis courts too ?
V: ???tennisla engada quota vanthichi
S: men and women tournaments they dont compete together.. but in different categories..
V: hmm..vidhaysamana point so?
S: vera enna..
V: gals schoolenthu vara topperukum boys schoolenthu vara topperukum coedlenthu varavanukum ennada Vidyasam endla yaru state topperungarthu thaan matter
chessla paaru judit polgar is women world no. 1 but men rankingla somewhere in top ten stl wen she wins any tourney she gets her share..rtful share no discrim. there
cha ithellam en blogla potrunthena supera irunthrukm
S: see da..
mens tourney is more stronger.. but womens is not.. so men deserve more money
women do not deserver that much money that's my point
V: athelticsla kooda itha naan accept panuvenda..bt not for tennis
see u dnt need to be strong to win..roddick serves faster than a bullet
but federer trashes him
S: tennis le.. venus or sania ve.. any 1000th ranking ATP player kooda adippan
V: mixed doublesla paruda... i've seen martina and leander winning against stronger opp. on martinas strength
S: whatever da..but that's cause.. they play weaker women-men combination
S: you think leander-martina can win any men-men doubles match
S: dude.. you must get the argument rightwomen skill wise are not really in the league as men full stop
V: hmmm..onnu pannalam...ithaye inoru posta podrenletssee how people argue
S: if women players can bring more viewers to stadium or women players get higher TRPs
then.. thy should be paid more than men..
cause.. having higher skill does not necessarily mean.. you get rewarded..
having more crowd is more imp
sports is now like entertainment..
V: en TL super point sonnar
V: ask women to play for 5 sets and
then demand money
S: no da..that's a bad point what i am telling you is..sports is now more like entertainment industry
V: hmm so
S: if sania or maria get more ppl than men watching the game..
S: then give them money
V: :D :D
S: if there s poor audience then.. dont pay
S: afterall.. you know how it works..demand is what generates.. everything..
V: :D :D
economist mathiri pesara